
"From the initial interview until the check came I was treated like family. I have and will continue to recommend you to friends and family."
"I was impressed with your firm from the beginning... Although I'm sure you are totally busy with cases I always felt as though mine were the only one you were handling. All my calls were promptly returned and I really appreciate that."
"You were right up front about what the workers' compensation adjuster would try to do. I did not know anything about workers' compensation laws. I think your firm did an amazing job for me and my family."
"You were very easy to work with."
"You really know workers' compensation."
"You were the experts... I absolutely could not have gotten the same results without your help."
"You helped me in every way."
"You were abale to spot the problems immediately and fix them."
"There's no way I could have gotten the same results without your help."
"Your office a very, very profesional office. You have always treated me with great respect, honesty, and integrity."
Martindale-Hubbell's Peer Review Ratings are considered invaluable when evaluating a lawyer. When making referrals or looking for counsel in another jurisdiction, lawyers need to have confidence in the individual under consideration. By reviewing the Ratings, they can select counsel with superior ethics, as well as the desired level of professional experience.
Peer Review Ratings attest to a lawyer's legal ability and professional ethics, and reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and Judiciary. The Ratings are part of a century-long tradition and are exclusive to Martindale-Hubbell. The legal community respects the accuracy of Ratings because it knows that its own members - the people best suited to assess their peers - are directly involved in the process.
Legal Ability Ratings take into consideration the standard of professional ability in the area where the lawyer practices, the lawyer's expertise, and other professional qualifications. If a lawyer's practice is limited or specialized, Peer Review Ratings are based on performance in those specific fields of law.
Legal Ability Ratings are:
C - Good to High
B - High to Very High
A - Very High to Preeminent
The General Ethical Standards Rating denotes adherence to professional standards of conduct and ethics, reliability, diligence and other criteria relevant to the discharge of professional responsibilities.
The General Recommendation Rating is:
V - Very High
A lawyer will not receive a Legal Ability Rating unless he or she has been endorsed for a "V." When both categories of Peer Review Ratings are confirmed, a lawyer receives an CV, BV or AV Rating.
CV Peer Review Rating — an excellent first Rating and a statement of a lawyer's above average ability and very high ethics.
BV Peer Review Rating — an indication of an exemplary reputation and well-established practice. A typical lawyer is in mid-career, with a significant client base and high professional standing.
AV Peer Review Rating — shows that a lawyer has reached the height of professional excellence. He or she has usually practiced law for many years, and is recognized for the highest levels of skill and integrity.
Simple, it shows who really knows what they're doing. It's what separates the serious lawyers from the guys on television who spend more time with the advertising agency than they do in the courtroom. Workers' Compensation is not a place for amateurs, and your case is too important to trust to someone who does a little comp, a little real estate, and a divorce here and there. Who do the insurance companies use? Lawyers who do workers' comp and nothing else. You cannot afford a lawyer who knows less about workers' compensation law than your employer and the insurance company does.
Click here to go to the North Carolina Bar Association's website to see who is Board Certified in Workers' Compensation and who is just doing a lot of advertising.
The Board of Legal Specialization was created in 1983 by the North Carolina State Bar and began certifying North Carolina lawyers as legal specialists in 1987. The Board was established to create a method by which qualified North Carolina lawyers might become certified as specialists in designated areas of the law. The goals of the legal certification program are twofold.
First, the program assists in the delivery of legal services to the public by identifying to the public those lawyers who have demonstrated special knowledge, skill, and proficiency in a specific field. By identifying these lawyers, members of the public can more closely match their needs with available services.
Second, the legal specialization program seeks to improve the competency of members of the Bar by establishing an additional incentive for lawyers to participate in continuing legal education and to meet other requirements of specialization.
Our book "10 Ways to Wreck Your Workers’ Compensation Claim" and our controversial report 10 Things Your Insurance Adjuster Won’t Tell You"

Our book
"10 Ways to Wreck Your
Workers’ Compensation Claim"
Our controversial report
"10 Things Your Insurance Adjuster Won’t Tell You"
Begin your case review by filling out the form below or call us toll free at 866 OTP Law1
Greensboro
800 Green Valley Road
Suite 304
Greensboro, NC 27408
Phone: (336) 274-4494
Fax: (336) 274-4525
Directions
Winston-Salem
110 Oakwood Drive
Suite 420
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Phone: (336) 274-4494
Fax (336) 631-5225
Directions
Burlington
409 Alamance Road
Suite C
Burlington, NC 27215
Phone: (336) 226-5925
Fax: (336) 226-4492
Directions
Raleigh
3737 Glenwood Ave
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Phone: (919) 573-5241
Fax: (919) 785-2239
Directions
Asheboro
854 South Cox Street
Asheboro, NC 27203
Phone: (336) 633-4496
Fax: (336) 633-3394
Directions
What should I do if I am injured on the job?
My workers' comp claim is denied. How long will it take to win it?
How do I get my day in court in a Workers’ Comp claim?
Does this law firm handle cases not related to workers' comp?
What is Board Certification? Does it matter?
Can you lend me money against my case?
The Workers' Comp Adjuster Denied a Perfectly Legitimate Claim.
An Example of a Workers' Comp Adjuster Manipulating the Recorded Statement.