
"From the initial interview until the check came I was treated like family. I have and will continue to recommend you to friends and family."
"I was impressed with your firm from the beginning... Although I'm sure you are totally busy with cases I always felt as though mine were the only one you were handling. All my calls were promptly returned and I really appreciate that."
"You were right up front about what the workers' compensation adjuster would try to do. I did not know anything about workers' compensation laws. I think your firm did an amazing job for me and my family."
"You were very easy to work with."
"You really know workers' compensation."
"You were the experts... I absolutely could not have gotten the same results without your help."
"You helped me in every way."
"You were abale to spot the problems immediately and fix them."
"There's no way I could have gotten the same results without your help."
"Your office a very, very profesional office. You have always treated me with great respect, honesty, and integrity."
Our client, a truck driver, had earned nearly $1000 per week as a tractor-trailer driver. His truck flipped and he suffered head injuries and back injuries. He couldn't return to work as a truck driver. As is often the case the insurance adjuster assigned a vocational rehabiliation professional to have him look for work.
We proved the vocational rehabiliation professional from Page Rehabiliation (on of the largest and most aggressive vocational rehab companies) completely disregarded the Industrial Commission rules for job searches. These included her request that our client put in for $8/hr jobs, part-time jobs, look for jobs in 30 miles from him home, and continued the job search when it should have been obvious that he wasn't going to find suitable employment.
This case is an example of why adjusters love vocational rehabilitation. Indeed many of them use a short-hand verb, "to voke" an injured worker is to try to drive the plaintiff into giving up by having him look for terrible jobs. In fairness, some vocational rehab professionals refuse to cooperate with such goals, and nearly all get angry at the term "to voke." Fortunately our client was willing to stay the course and we had this rehab provider removed from the claim.
Footnote: We also learned a lesson in this case. The Industrial Commission is no longer satisfied with just tearing up defendants' witnesses. We needed to hire our own experts to put on the necessary evidence. In this case we produced sufficient evidence after the claim that defendants settled on terms quite favorable to our client.
Our client was an insulation installer on his way to a job site. He was the passenger in a company truck which got in an accident and rolled over. In a classic example of insurance company delay tactics the adjuster refused to accept or deny the claim. When we filed a written request to the Industrial Commission to force a decision in this obvious case, the insurance defense attorney blatantly lied to the Commission claiming that benefits were being paid on a Form 63.
This story fell apart at the hearing and the insurance company took the creative approach of arguing that while the truck rollling over and, yes, the plaintiff had to be taken to the emergency room for treatment there was not enough evidence for them to determine if the treatment offered at the emergency room was related to the accident. It would be funny if it hadn't taken our client nearly a year to get the benefits he should have had from the start.
Read the full opinion by clicking below. The username is "public" and there is no password needed.
In another failed attempt at "deny and buy" (the insurance industry trick of denying an obviously good claim in the hope of starving an injured worker into a cheap settlement) this restaurant denied the workers comp claim when their dishwasher slipped on a piece of butter, fell on his back, and was taken to the emergency room.
While it isn't recorded in the Opinion and Award the defendant first tried to claim that our client wasn't even on the job. Fortunately we'd immediately made copies of his time card -- so we were able to prove that was, in fact, there. This claim got ugly fast as the defendants poured thousands of dollars into trying every dirty trick in the book. We fought back with a series of tape-recorded interviews, our own investigator, and relentless pressure on a defendant who was willing to do almost anything to avoid payment of the claim.
Read the full opinion below. The usename is "public" and there is no password.
Our client, a brick mason, fell and injured his back. After lengthy treatment he was able to walk -- but awkwardly with a cane. He needed modifications to his kitchen, bathroom, and other parts of his house to make it easier for him to get around. Additionally, because he had difficulty keeping the house and yard up to proper standards the Industrial Commission ordered Liberty Mutual to provide a housekeeper and a yardboy.
Additionally, we were able to prove that our client had previously roofed his own house and painted it. So when the house required a new paint job Liberty Mutual had to pay for it.
The key to this case was our willingness to hire an expert to go with us to our client's house, meet with him, and make recommendations as to what he needed. This is an example of why spending a $1,000 up front can payoff ten or twenty times that in the value of the case. Plus we had negotiated with Liberty Mutual's attorney upfront that they would accept the expert's recommendations.
Read the opinion below. The username is "public" and there is no password.
This case illustrates a rare, but difficult situation. Our truck driver client had two separate accidents and didn't report either of them until a month or so after the second. Which accident lead to the need for surgery? Often it doesn't matter but in this case the employer had changed insurance companies in the interim. Neither wanted to take responsibility for it.
The biggest weakness in the case was our client's delay in reporting the claim. In fact he didn't do so until he found out he needed surgery. The next biggest problem was that he didn't get his information lined up beforehand. He described the facts of the accident but had it occuring in the wrong month. This gave the company's safety manager a cheap and easy excuse to deny the claim.
We took statements from a coworker and put the employer's safety manager on the stand immediately. We forced her to admit that the injured worker had indeed reported the claim to the company although to the wrong supervisor. However it is the Industrial Commission which defines the rules for reporting the claim -- not an adjuster or safety manager. We also forced her to admit that while our client put the initial accident in the wrong month she could very easily have confirmed the correct date by all of the other facts which he did have straight.
As a side note, several months after this one of the insurance company's witnesses referred a friend of hers to us for another denied claim. After having been involved in dozens of hearings she said this was the one time that the plaintiff's attorney was in complete control of the hearing from start to finish and her attorneys didn't stand a chance.
Read the entire opinion below. The username is "public" and there is no password.
We don't go out of our way to get involved in other North Carolina lawyer's cases. But when we see an injured worker who isn't getting the help he needs in his workers' compensation case we'll intervene. Sometimes this is when the other attorney is passing all of the work off onto paralegals and doesn't have time for the injured worker. Other times it's when the attorney won't return phone calls. In this case the original attorney, a well-known auto accident defense attorney, was trying his hand at representing an injured worker. While he was inexperienced at this type of law Key Risk's lawyer wasn't and was beating the plaintiff badly. The original attorney got in over head at the hearing and basically threw up his hands and went no further.
We were able to get involved in the case, get the medical evidence we needed, succussfully got the insurance company's doctor to change the date of maximum medical improvement so that we could obtain far more in benefits than our client expected, and secured lifetime medical benefits for this injured plumber to boot.
Click to read the Industrial Commission decision. User name is "public" and there is no password
The workers' compensation adjuster at Argonaut Insurance Company denied this carpal tunnel syndrome case for a truck driver. The injured worker came to us for help based on the referral from a friend. We retained an ergonomics expert who testified that the vibration coming from the steering wheel and the gear shifter could cause carpal tunnel syndrome. With this piece of evidence we refused to settle at a mediation and took the case to a hearing. Without it we surely would have lost the case. Defendants sought permission to send our client to their hand-picked doctor; however we prepared our client for this visit and sent him with the ergonomics report. Even the insurance company doctor had to concede the point in the face of our ergonomics report. The workers compensation defendants dropped their denial and gave in even to our choice of treating doctors.
Our client underwent successful surgery, collected his permanent partial disability ratings, and is back at work as a truck driver.
Follow the link to read the decision. The user name is "public" and there is no password.
The workers' compensation adjuster at Kemper Insurance accepted this claim as compensable and sent this injured laundry worker to the "company doctor" who told her to work light duty. When she did this she was soon fired from the job. Through extremely aggressive courtroom tactics we produced evidence that the North Carolina Industrial Commission described as follows:
"Employer terminated plaintiff as part of a scheme between Mr. Barnes and Mr. Williams and not due to any fault or misconduct on the part of plaintiff. Mr. Barnes and Mr. Williams specifically created a scenario under which they could terminate plaintiff and claim that it was for absenteeism. Mr. Barnes and Mr. Williams continued this scheme through their sworn testimony"
Unfortunately we see this happening in most cases where injured workers go back to their jobs too soon. While this time it was in Greensboro, North Carolina we've seen it occurring throughout the state.
Follow the link to read the decision. The user name is "public" and there is no password.
My client, a collections worker for Oakwood Homes, was asked to participate in a fundraising event for charity. While he was off the clock everyone in his department was doing it and he was pressured to help out. Unfortunately while working on the project he seriously injured his back.
The workers' compensation adjuster from ACE USA denied the claim and basically tried to starve the injured worker into a settlement. He refused and we took this case to hearing even though most similar cases had gone down in defeat. Our willingness to take risks was rewarded with a big win for our client.
The key bit of testimony was that the employer benefitted from the "team-building" aspects of the project, and thus while it was technically for charity the employer profited from it as well.
To read the North Carolina Industrial Commission decision click. User name is "public" and there is no password.
Our client fell and injured her elbow, ultimately requiring surgery. She then contracted a terrible case of Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy which largely confined her to a wheelchair. We persuaded her physicians to order attendant care for her (having someone help with her activities of daily living) as well a major renovations to her house to make it wheelchair accessible.
The adjuster initially agreed to provide attendant care but couldn't find anyone in this rural area to do it. The adjuster refused to pay family members to provide the care. The North Carolina Industrial Commission ruled in our favor.
Note: in this Opinion and Award the NCIC also required defendants to build a new house for the plaintiff. This was subsequently overturned. Defendants instead spent over $100,000 in modifications.
Read the full case below. The username is "public" and there is no password.
Our clients were the children of a cafeteria worker who broke her pelvis when she slipped and fell, with a cart landing on top of her. While they had willingly taken care of their mother, who passed away from other causes, they came to us when Cambridge's adjuster refused to even pay their mother's rating for her fracture.
We retroactively obtained evidence of the need for attendant care and also of the permanent partial disability rating, and won both of these fights at the North Carolina Industrial Commission.
We also tried to find a link between our clients' mother's death from COPD and her being bedridden. While it made sense to us that this would have worsened by her lack of exercise her physicians explained that she was in pretty bad shape already at the time of the fall. While we lost on that point we firmly believe it is critical to be (a) willing to lose and (b) never give up trying to win.
Read the opinion and award below. The username is "public" and there is no password.
Our client, an oil change technician, injured his back rotating tires. He had previously injured his back while working in construction but did not require surgery. He settled his first workers' comp claim and changed jobs into something easier.
While this should have been obviously a compensable claim given that he complained of pain immediately while working, the adjuster from Hartford employed an old "deny and buy" trick of denying the claim because she couldn't tell whether or not the current need for surgery was due to the old accident or the new one. Plaintiff's neurosurgeon was perfectly clear about it but Hartford apparently wanted to see if the automotive tech would fold and settle cheap.
Fortunately he didn't and Hartford Insurance ended up paying the claim.
Read the decision below. The username is "public" and there is no password.
Our client had gunwounds to his hand, shoulder, and thigh. As a result of these he struggles to do his own yardwork and housecleaning. Given that he had been able to do all of this before he was shot in a robbery outside his Charlotte restaurant we believed that GAB Robbins and Royal Insurance should provide assistance with this.
Unfortunately plaintiff's doctor, an excellent surgeon, was not willling to go along with this idea. When he was quizzed about the North Carolina Industrial Commission's requirement of all medical treatment necessary to "effect a cure, provide relief, or lessen the period of disability" he noted that a yardboy would provide relief to anyone -- whether they were on workers compensation or not.
Fortunately, we had already had an expert in the area of attendant care meet with our client at his house. While the surgeon didn't see what was really necessary he did agree to defer to this expert. The North Carolina Industrial Commission agree with us and awarded the requested services.
This is a real example of being prepared. Had we walked into the doctor's office without the expert's statement we would have walked out losing the case. By arranging for this ahead of time we won what GAB Robbin's adjuster thought was an impossible case.
Read the opinion below. The username is "public" and there is no password.

Our book
"10 Ways to Wreck Your
Workers’ Compensation Claim"
Our controversial report
"10 Things Your Insurance Adjuster Won’t Tell You"
Begin your case review by filling out the form below or call us toll free at 866 OTP Law1
Greensboro
800 Green Valley Road
Suite 304
Greensboro, NC 27408
Phone: (336) 274-4494
Fax: (336) 274-4525
Directions
Winston-Salem
110 Oakwood Drive
Suite 420
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Phone: (336) 274-4494
Fax (336) 631-5225
Directions
Burlington
409 Alamance Road
Suite C
Burlington, NC 27215
Phone: (336) 226-5925
Fax: (336) 226-4492
Directions
Raleigh
3737 Glenwood Ave
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Phone: (919) 573-5241
Fax: (919) 785-2239
Directions
Asheboro
854 South Cox Street
Asheboro, NC 27203
Phone: (336) 633-4496
Fax: (336) 633-3394
Directions
What should I do if I am injured on the job?
My workers' comp claim is denied. How long will it take to win it?
How do I get my day in court in a Workers’ Comp claim?
Does this law firm handle cases not related to workers' comp?
What is Board Certification? Does it matter?
Can you lend me money against my case?
The Workers' Comp Adjuster Denied a Perfectly Legitimate Claim.
An Example of a Workers' Comp Adjuster Manipulating the Recorded Statement.